|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 29, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Entertainment
| Previous
Tentative beginnings
What does theatre have to do with the IT revolution? A recent
seminar in Kolkata sought to highlight the advantages of a
partnership between the two. GOWRI RAMNARAYAN writes.
AN uneasy pairing? I expected the Hutchison Telecom JV seminar on
"Theatre in the Context of the New IT Era" (June 24, Kolkata) to
be just that. Particularly as the participating theatre persons
knew little of Information Technology, and the techies had less
hands-on experience of theatre.
And yet, as in arranged marriages in India, the participants
managed to develop some compatibility by the end of the day in
this first-time venture of its kind, the result of something
rarely seen in seminars: the speakers were as interested in
listening as in sharing their own perspectives.
The panel was tilted towards artistes - film makers Aparna Sen
and Ashoke Viswanathan; Mohan Agashe, actor and director of the
Film and Television Institute, Pune. Theatre/film critic and
litterateur Samik Bandyopadhyay steered the show, with
director/actor Vijaya Mehta, now chairperson of NCPA, delivering
a keynote worthy of her eminence in the field. Dr. Suparno
Choudhuri and Ram Ray represented IT and advertising.
Mehta began with apprehensions. After all, IT is the invasive
alien in our private worlds, gaining mesmeric ascendancy over
mind and body. The great influences seeping into our arts are
from instant communication which casts impersonality over human
interactions, and the encroachment of television. "But theatre
will continue to remain a social necessity," she said, because
television can never rise beyond personal indulgence. While this
makes people comfortable and smug, theatre stimulates enquiry,
protest and sensitivity.
Shifts in audience tastes and needs dictate changes in the
theatre. But the fast pace of life makes it difficult for theatre
groups to work long hours together to reach excellence. So - as
in the other arts - theatre too finds itself with plays of
diminished layers and textures. Corporate and government funding
is no answer to the fall in standards.
Dr. Mohan Agashe agreed that IT's explosive speed and modalities
of communicating information had revolutionised our methods of
reception. We acquire in 30 years what it took 60 years to
accumulate earlier. Such assimilation of information cerebrally
through the simulated pathways of virtual reality takes its toll.
When oral tradition and one's own life experience were sources of
information in the past, they also gratified the needs of matter
and sense. Technology starved the senses, blurred borders between
the real and the unreal. By the greater possibilities it offered
for manipulating sound and image, IT also tampered with the
information conveyed.
Result? Imbalance between emotional and mental needs; more
importantly between our need and our greed in the dil mange more
culture of our times. Like Mehta, Agashe too expressed
reservations about corporate control of culture.
Agashe concluded on a note of speculation: Was homo sapiens in a
transition phase - of evolving into something else altogether?
Was the new species going to apprehend emotions through the head
after all, and not the heart? Will theatre have to discover new
ways of processing experience and information to survive in a
different era?
Do not fault IT for theatre's loss of substance, said Ashoke
Viswanathan. The problem lay deeper within ourselves. On the one
hand we had lost our capacity to dream and to communicate; on the
other we lacked the passion to fire creativity. Humour is a
casualty as standardisation replaces the heterogeneity on which
theatre thrives.
Aparna Sen suggested that audiences could be sensitised once
again to the arts if trained theatrepersons worked in TV, making
better programmes instead of shunning it. Meanwhile, good middle-
of-the road cinema and theatre were essential to combat TV
addiction.
Physicist Dr. Suparno Choudhuri focussed on the advantages:
digital technology could greatly improve light and acoustics, and
multimedia could be explored for interactive experience on stage.
In dotcoms, technical experts could only improve methods of
presentation, the content depended on creative minds. The same
principle could be applied to experiments in the theatre. Finally
Ram Ray showed how the Internet is an invaluable aid in gaining
information on theatre across the globe. You can learn about
theatre companies and festivals, even view scenes to select your
play in Broadway or the West End, and book your tickets in
advance. You can read theatre journals, find out about drama
schools and courses, with possibilities of distance learning.
Nine commentators from different fields (physics, social science,
theatre, journalism) had both postive and negative reactions to
share, one of them saw the endeavour as an exercise in futility,
a five-star show.
Part of Odeon 2001, a theatre festival which featured three plays
- "Nilkantha" (Bengali), "Khubsurat Bahu" (Hindi) and "Dance Like
a Man" (English) - the seminar saw the tentative beginnings of
interchange between people of differing worlds, and the
possibilities of enriching crossovers. Almost everyone felt the
need to harness IT to aid creative experimentation, to enhance
the awareness of the real experience of art.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Entertainment Previous : Strokes of a genius | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|