|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, July 29, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Hazardous hues
The continuing use of different types of plastic is a threat to
the environment. SHEELA RANI CHUNKATH writes on the necessity for
a return to eco-friendly ways of living.
"INDIANS do not know how to sell. Look at the Americans, they
package their products beautifully and make it attractive for
consumers to buy." How often have people made this statement
belittling Indian manufacturers and producers for paying little
attention to packaging. With the opening up of the economy, we
are deluged by goods, all attractively packed and begging to be
bought. But stop. Take a moment to look at the material in which
the products are being packed. It is that ubiquitous material,
plastic. Hailed as one of the greatest inventions at the time of
its introduction, plastics are now being regarded in the west and
other environmentally conscious societies as a hazard. Western
societies, used to the convenience of plastics and bullied by the
powerful plastic lobby, are finding it difficult to get plastics
out of their waste stream. One of the strategies they are
adopting is to export their plastic waste, often badly
contaminated, to the third world. Their plastic discards are
being shipped to third world countries such as India, as
recyclables, taking advantage of the lack of awareness among the
public.
Consider the following facts. Producing a 500 ml PET bottle (PET
is the abbreviation of Polyethylene Terepthalate - a type of
plastic) generates more than 100 times the toxic emissions to air
and water than making the same size bottle out of glass. In
addition to creating safety and health problems during
production, many chemical additives that give plastic products
desirable packaging qualities also have negative environmental
and human effects. These effects include direct toxicity as in
the case of lead, cadmium and mercury. Most of the colourful pots
or kudams which are locally manufactured by recycling would have
these toxic additives. Problem chemicals are used in the
manufacture of plastic containers for heat stabilisation and as
plasticisers. Food can be contaminated by plastic containers
because some chemicals diffuse from the packaging polymer of
which they are made to the foods they contain. Migration
potential exists for traces of monomers, oligorners, additives,
stabilisers, plasticisers and lubricants. Such substances may be
toxic. A report of the Berkeley (U.S.) Plastics Task Force
published in 1996 found that styrene from polystyrene,
plasticisers from PVC, antioxidants from polyethylene and
acetaldehyde from PET have the potential to contaminate food. Yet
despite its known toxic impact, the use of PET in bottles such as
those for soda has increased by 54 per cent between 1995 and 1998
in the U.S..
Compared to plastics, glass is a far more environmentally
friendly packing container. First, chemical contamination of food
in a glass container is not likely. Second, glass containers can
be used up to 25 - 30 times, as they can be easily washed and
refilled. Third, glass can be recycled because of its short
molecular structure, whereas plastic becomes brittle with
recycling. We are all familiar with the soda bottles of
yesteryear, which were refilled dozens of times till they became
chipped or broken at which point they would be sent for
recycling. I marvel at the ingenuity of the marble stopper fitted
in the bottle - a truly eco-friendly piece of engineering design:
multiple reuse and no wastage.
During the last decade, however, these eco-friendly bottles have
been phased out. Eco-unfriendly plastic bottles and plastic
packaging now dominate the scene. The Berkeley taskforce
estimated that 29 kg of plastic waste per person was either burnt
or buried in landfills of their city. And Berkeley did have a
plastics recycling programme. These statistics show that there is
a limit to plastics recycling and that environmentally conscious
individuals should be more concerned with reducing consumption of
plastic packaging at source.
Studies in the U.S. show that even as plastic reprocessing/
recycling rates have increased, so has the amount of virgin
plastic resin production. Hence the need to emphasise reduction
at source, if one is to tackle the problem of waste disposal.
Plastic packaging is slowly becoming the norm in India and we are
happy to carry away water, juice, biscuits, chips, muruku, dal,
pickles, curd, chicken and ready-to-eat dishes, in plastic
containers. In 1995, of the 32 million tonnes of plastic resin
produced in the U.S., nearly 40 per cent was used for packing and
for producing containers, much of which ended up in landfills or
was burnt. Municipal waste incineration, especially with
chlorinated plastics, leads to release of dioxin which is a known
carcinogen and which affects the reproductive system. It is not
too late for us in India to go back to our old ways of carrying
our own cloth bags for shopping, taking stainless steel tiffin
carriers for take-out food, and drinking boiled tap water. We
need to encourage and demand more eco-friendly packaging; glass
bottles instead of plastic, less packing instead of more, and
reusable instead of throwaway.
Remember the days when jasmine flowers were wrapped in banana
leaves and tied with a banana fibre. The banana leaf was replaced
by plastic carry bags and we looked upon it as progress. For real
progress we need to turn the clock back and go back to our more
eco-friendly ways when we consumed less and threw away much less.
The writer is the Chairperson of the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control
Board.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Some good news Next : Reading between the lines | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|